Structured literacy professional learning · AB 121 · CDE-approved
A best-in-class model for professional growth: teachers acquire critical Structured Literacy skills and actively apply them in their own classrooms as part of the course.
Built for California
Reviewed and approved for AB 121, with every scenario built from the published California ELA/ELD Framework vignettes and aligned to the California Dyslexia Guidelines.
The implementation promise
Flexible pathways, focused instructional scenarios, and classroom implementation credited toward required hours. Under 30 hours in total.
New to AB 121? Read the CDE's literacy PD funding guidance and approved program list (cde.ca.gov, opens in a new tab)
CDE-approved literacy PD provider
#1 online program and top 20% of all 31 State Board–approved AB 121 programs. Districts keep 70%+ of their funding.
Under 30 hours total
15 or fewer hours online
Practice counts as PD
Dollars stay in California
The moment
Sources: CDE Literacy PD Programs (AB 121) and the 2025–26 apportionment letter (EC 33319.6; EC 44320.3).
$1,686.82
per TK–5 teacher FTE, allocated by the CDE for Science of Reading professional learning
Oct–Nov 2026
the full allocation lands directly in district accounts
June 2030
spendable through the four-year window, with priority for teachers not yet through the literacy assessment
Many districts have already adopted a structured literacy curriculum. The harder part is what comes next: teachers short on time, implementation that drifts, and the largest gaps still sitting with students in special education and multilingual learners. Spread thin, the money buys a course and little else. LearnSync is built so it reaches classrooms and keeps working for four years.
Why LearnSync for California?
Among the shortest programs on California's approved list, because classroom practice counts.
<30 hrs
Under 30 hours in total, 15 or fewer online, and designed to fit inside the PD days and PLC time districts already have. Most approved programs ask for 15–20 hours of teachers' evenings and weekends before a single lesson changes.
Real cases
Course 1 builds knowledge through authentic classroom vignettes from the California ELA/ELD Framework, and checks understanding in an instructional context.
In class
Course 2 is applied practice with teachers' own students, analyzed with coaches and peers. That instructional time is credited toward required hours.
CDE-reviewed and approved
Both courses on the state's approved provider list.
Aligned to California's expectations
ELA/ELD Framework and the California Dyslexia Guidelines.
Implementation support
Role-based tools for coaches, principals, and district leads.
Flexible for district context
Roll out by grade band, by site, or countywide.
What we're hearing from California leaders
From our conversations with district leaders across the state this fall.
"Teachers tell me: I don't know what to do, I don't have the materials, and I don't have time outside the PD windows to go and find it on my own."
What LearnSync does
Runs inside existing PD days and PLC time, with lesson materials and a resource library built in, so it never feels like another initiative.
"Our biggest gaps are with students in special education and our multilingual learners. That's where the money needs to go."
What LearnSync does
In Course 2, every teacher names three to five focal students and applies the strategies to their lessons, so the training lands on the children with the biggest gaps first.
"Fidelity is our biggest risk. Teachers are still using a little of this and a little of that, and a structured literacy program has to be done in a structured way."
What LearnSync does
Builds common language across every site, gives coaches an operating system for PLCs, and captures what teachers are noticing about students so leaders can see practice shift.
Swap in the platform's scenario video; a PK–3 classroom is preferred so leaders see their own schools in it.
In the classroom
Rather than rote quizzes or completion checklists, each module ends with an Instructional Scenario Review built from the published California ELA/ELD Framework vignettes: an authentic classroom scenario grounded in real teacher moves.
Before
A second-grade teacher sees students guessing at words from pictures and context.
With LearnSync
She analyzes a vignette of explicit, systematic decoding instruction, chooses an anchor strategy, and names three focal students, two of them multilingual learners.
In her classroom
She teaches the lesson Tuesday, brings student work to her coach and peers, and the time counts toward her hours.
The LearnSync Literacy Program
Course 1
Real scenarios, not cartoons and quizzes.
Teachers learn the anchor strategies of structured literacy by analyzing authentic instructional vignettes: what a strong decision looks like in a real lesson, and why. About an hour per module.
Six modules
1 · The Science of Reading
2 · Phonological & phonemic awareness
3 · Phonics & decoding
4 · Fluency
5 · Vocabulary & comprehension
6 · Differentiation & equity
Course 2
Practice in your own classroom, counted as PD.
Each teacher names three to five focal students, applies the anchor strategies to targeted lessons with them, then brings the student work back to coaches and peers. The in-class practice is the course, and it is credited toward required hours.
What teachers walk away with
What leaders and educators are saying
We were skeptical about the reliance on multiple-choice quizzes to assess educator skill. The LearnSync model let our educators take the strategies directly into their classrooms as part of the course, and we've seen a huge difference in immediate implementation.
Beth Johnson · Director of Professional Learning Services
We piloted several of the popular Science of Reading programs. LearnSync was the only one that gave us flexible pathways through the content and let us demonstrate our skills by analyzing scenarios and applying our learning in classroom practice.
Gabe Ortiz · K–2 ELA Teacher & Reading Coach
AB 121 funding math
Spread thin
~$450
per teacher per year if every TK–5 teacher trains at once. Most goes to provider fees; little is left for coaches.
In waves
$900–1,500
per trained teacher per year: PK–1 in year one, grades 2–3 in year two, and on through the window.
With LearnSync
$350
per teacher through a county partnership ($450 direct). Well over half of the allocation stays with the district for its own coaches and TOSAs.
Our pricing rests on one belief: the money should pay for coaching and classroom practice, not provider fees. Illustrative figures from the CDE allocation schedule; a worked example for your district is available on request.
How LearnSync compares
The State Board of Education approved 31 AB 121 literacy programs. Here is the top 20% side by side, using the state's own review scores and each provider's published pricing.
#1
Online program
Highest-rated online program on the approved list.
47 / 54
CDE review score
Top 20% of the 31 approved programs.
$350–450
per teacher
$350 through a county partnership, $450 direct. Published prices across the list run from $199 to $3,237.
73–79%
of AB 121 funding retained by the district
One of only four top-20% programs where districts keep 70% or more.
| Rank | Program (top 20%) | CDE score | Cost / teacher | District keeps | Hours | Classroom application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CABE — BEACONS | 53 | Not published | — | 84 | Year-long cohort with coaching cycles |
| 2 | SchoolKit — Customized PD | 53 | Not published | — | Varies | Custom coaching |
| 3 | Keys to Literacy — Comp. Literacy K–5 | 50 | $450 | 73% | 50 | Modules, four delivery formats |
| 4 | LACOE — Getting Reading Right | 50 | $300 | 82% | 20 | Live seminars with follow-up tasks |
| 5 | Literacy Squared | 48 | $1,800 / hr + travel | — | Varies | Learning labs |
| 6 | One Learning CA — LearnSync Literacy | 47 | $350–450 | 73–79% | <30 | In-class applied learning, credited as PD |
| 7 | Sacramento COE — California READS | 47 | $500 | 70% | 40 | Live modules, 33 hrs live |
Source: California Department of Education, Literacy Professional Development Program List & Memos. Scores out of 54. "District keeps" is the share of the $1,686 per-FTE allocation left after the provider's per-teacher cost. Ties are ordered by published cost per teacher. LearnSync's row reflects current pricing and hours; other rows are as submitted to the CDE in February 2026.
Two ways to partner
Lead the rollout with the districts you already serve. Convene role-based networks for teachers, coaches, principals, and literacy leads, and give site coaches a ready-made operating system for their PLCs. Lead staff accounts are free.
Join as a founding county partnerContract directly, or at the county partnership rate, and keep well over half of your allocation for your own coaches. Every partnership starts with a four-year implementation plan.
Ask for a worked funding example Read the CDE's AB 121 guidance →Science of Reading resources & articles from the field
Recent resources, articles, videos, and emerging models of practice, curated from national providers including Reading Universe. Counties, districts, and sites can add their own for targeted distribution to their educators.
AB 121, the ELA/ELD Framework, and the Dyslexia Guidelines in one place.
Explicit, systematic, cumulative instruction, explained and modeled.
The research base, in plain language, for teachers and leaders.
Routines, agendas, and tools for coaches and site leaders.
About LearnSync
LearnSync Literacy is a fully online, California-approved Structured Literacy professional development program built to satisfy AB 121's Science of Reading training requirement for TK–5 teachers. It comes from One Learning Community, and we built it because this funding should become lasting literacy infrastructure, not another round of compliance training.
Learn more about LearnSync and our mission →
Robert Sheffield
Co-Founder
Robert brings more than 30 years of experience improving teaching and learning, from the classroom to executive leadership at College Board, WestEd, and CORE Learning. Throughout his career, he has focused on building and scaling systems that translate research into effective classroom practice. He co-founded LearnSync to address a challenge he has encountered throughout his career: making high-quality professional learning accessible, actionable, and sustainable at scale. His experience shapes LearnSync's approach to connecting the science of reading with the everyday work of teaching, helping educators strengthen instruction within the curricula and classrooms they already use.
Brian Ausland
Co-Founder
Brian has built online learning for California educators since 1994, when he worked on some of the state's earliest online coursework. As founder of Navigation North Learning he authored the Smarter Balanced Technology Strategy Frameworks and has helped education agencies across the state get real use from their learning platforms. He leads the LearnSync platform and its resource library.
Garla Jalloh
President
Garla brings more than 30 years of experience in education, to include school and district leadership, professional learning, and organizational development. Garla has supported educators and school systems across California and nationally. She joined LearnSync with a commitment to translating literacy research into effective implementation, strengthening educator capacity, and achieving lasting literacy impact for all students.
Let's build it together
District leaders: ask us for a worked funding example for your district. County leaders: join us as a founding county partner.
contact@learnsync.net
Not sure what AB 121 means for your district yet? Start with the CDE's guidance.
AB 121 · Literacy instruction professional development
Every California district, charter and county office received an AB 121 allocation for TK–5 structured literacy training. Find yours, see what it buys, and compare the state's 31 approved programs.
1,691 local educational agencies · Source: CDE Schedule of Final Allocations, Literacy Instruction Professional Development, FY 2025–26
Your allocation
$0
Total AB 121 allocation
$1,686.82 per TK–5 teacher FTE, paid in full and spendable through June 2030
0
TK–5 certificated FTE
As reported in CALPADS, October 2025
$0
Per year over four years
If the allocation is spread evenly, 2026–27 through 2029–30
What it buys with LearnSync
Teachers in year one
0
LearnSync cost at $450 / teacher
$0
$350 per teacher through a county partnership
Left for your own coaches
$0
Illustrative. Uses the CDE allocation and LearnSync's published per-teacher price; your contract may differ. Ask for a worked example for your district →
How AB 121 funding works
$200M
statewide, paid in full for 2025–26
Allocated per TK–5 certificated FTE; no application required.
June 2030
spending window
Priority for teachers who have not passed the literacy performance assessment.
31
approved programs
Spend on an approved provider, your own program that meets the criteria, or coaching and staff time. Report by September 2029.
Sources: CDE Literacy Professional Development Programs · 2025–26 apportionment letter · EC 33319.6
The approved programs
| Rank | Program | CDE score | Cost / teacher | Your district keeps | Hours | Delivery |
|---|
Scores out of 54, per the CDE/WestEd review. "Your district keeps" uses your selected allocation and the provider's published per-teacher cost; it shows the statewide average ($1,686.82 per FTE) until a district is selected. Programs without a published per-teacher price are listed without a retained share. Ties ordered by cost. LearnSync's row reflects current pricing and hours; other rows are as submitted to the CDE in February 2026.
Next step
We'll run your numbers across a four-year rollout and send a one-page summary.
AB 121 · The 31 State Board–approved literacy PD programs
The state's review scored every approved program out of 54. We put those scores next to each provider's published cost per teacher, the share of AB 121 funding a district keeps, and the hours asked of teachers.
LearnSync on the state's review
47/54
Top 20% score
$350–450
per teacher
73–79%
funding kept by district
Quality
LearnSync is one of them. Designed to meet the specific needs of California, with a score higher than well-known national providers.
Cost
High scores and low cost rarely go together. LearnSync is one of the few top-20% programs that leave a district with 70% or more of its $1,686 per-teacher allocation.
Teachers' time
LearnSync comes in under 30 hours, 15 or fewer of them online, with the rest applied in teachers' own classrooms and credited toward their required hours. Most programs put every hour outside the classroom.
Head to head
One Learning CA · Rank 6
CDE score
47 / 54
Cost per teacher
$350–450
$350 via a county partnership, $450 direct
District keeps
73–79%
Hours
<30
15 or fewer online, the rest applied in class
Delivery
Hybrid: async coursework, then in-class applied learning with student work shared back
Rank 8
CDE score
47 / 54
Cost per teacher
$870
$40,000 package + $70 manual
District keeps
48%
Hours
28
plus follow-up
Delivery
Live virtual, in-person, or hybrid; year-long, tied to the UFLI phonics program
Rank 12
CDE score
45 / 54
Cost per teacher
$695–845
async, or facilitated
District keeps
50–59%
Hours
45
over 18 weeks
Delivery
9 async modules plus 3 live virtual sessions, cohort chat and optional coaching
Rank 15
CDE score
43 / 54
Cost per teacher
Not published
District keeps
—
Hours
120
89–168 hrs over two years
Delivery
Blended online and live, delivered over two years
The full picture
| Rank | Program | CDE score | Cost / teacher | District keeps | Hours | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CABE — BEACONS Top 20% | 53 | Not published | — | 84 | Year-long cohort, coaching cycles and portfolio |
| 2 | SchoolKit — Customized PD Top 20% | 53 | Not published | — | Varies | Fully customized PD and coaching |
| 3 | Keys to Literacy — Comp. Literacy K–5 Top 20% Keeps 70%+ | 50 | $450 | 73% | 50 | 12 modules; self-paced, facilitated, or live |
| 4 | LACOE — Getting Reading Right Top 20% Keeps 70%+ | 50 | $300 | 82% | 20 | Ten 2-hr live seminars with follow-up tasks |
| 5 | Literacy Squared Top 20% | 48 | $1,800 / hr + travel | — | Varies | Biliteracy sessions plus learning labs |
| 6 | One Learning CA — LearnSync Literacy Top 20% Keeps 70%+ | 47 | $350–450 | 73–79% | <30 | Hybrid: async coursework + in-class applied learning |
| 7 | Sacramento COE — California READS Top 20% Keeps 70%+ | 47 | $500 | 70% | 40 | 12 modules, 33 hrs live + 7 async |
| 8 | UFLI — Foundations for California Readers | 47 | $870 | 48% | 28 | Year-long PD tied to UFLI phonics program |
| 9 | CORE — Elementary Reading Academy | 46 | $1,170 | 31% | 42 | 7-day academy plus on-site coaching |
| 11 | San Diego COE — Multilingual Learner Success Keeps 70%+ | 45 | $400 | 76% | 47 | Six-day teacher series plus admin strand |
| 12 | CORE — Online Language & Literacy Academy | 45 | $695–845 | 50–59% | 45 | 9 async modules over 18 weeks + 3 live sessions |
| 13 | EL Education — K–5 ELA PL | 44 | $978 | 42% | Varies | Multi-year, tied to EL Education curriculum |
| 14 | IMSE — Orton-Gillingham+ / Morphology+ | 43 | $1,350 | 20% | 34 | Live virtual, in-person, or async courses |
| 15 | Lexia — LETRS | 43 | Not published | — | 120 | Blended, over two years |
| 16 | SEAL — Literacy & Learning | 42 | $1,333 | 21% | 36 | 4–5 in-person days plus leader CoPs |
| 18 | CA Reading & Literature Project | 41 | $1,200 | 29% | 18 | Menu of five 18-hr programs |
| 19 | Center for Model Schools (HMH) — PL Suite | 40 | $765 | 55% | 45 | Eight fully live IDA-accredited modules |
| 20 | 95 Percent Group — Top 10 Tools IDA Pathway | 39 | $1,163 | 31% | 75 | Online, self-paced, coach by email |
| 21 | TNTP — Elevating Literacy Excellence | 38 | $3,237 | 0% | 40 | Async course + in-person practice + 1:1 coaching |
| 22 | Reading Horizons — PL Suite Keeps 70%+ | 37 | $400 | 76% | 13 | 12 hrs live virtual plus video coaching |
| 23 | K. Casey Spengler — Best Practices | 37 | $750 | 56% | 25 | Five full days in two strands with classroom try-ons |
| 24 | Glean Education — Teacher Training | 37 | $1,680 | 0% | 20 | Systems audit then 20-hr training |
| 26 | OneBrainScience — 45-hr Comprehensive | 36 | $929 | 45% | 45 | Live comprehensive course, optional coaching |
| 29 | CAREI — CAREIALL K–12 Keeps 70%+ | 32 | $500 | 70% | 61 | Hybrid async modules plus live sessions |
| 30 | LitLife — SoR & Structured Literacy Keeps 70%+ | 31 | $295 | 83% | 55 | Online, self-paced, 80% mastery to advance |
| 31 | Amplify — SoR Learning Lab Keeps 70%+ | 30 | $199 | 88% | 80 | Three self-paced online courses |
Source: California Department of Education, Literacy Professional Development Programs (AB 121); provider published pricing as of October 2026. Scores out of 54. "District keeps" is the share of the $1,686 per-TK–5-FTE allocation remaining after the provider's per-teacher cost. Programs without a published per-teacher price are omitted from the full list. Where scores tie, programs are ordered by cost per teacher. LearnSync's row reflects current pricing and hours; all other rows are as submitted to the CDE in February 2026.
Next step
We'll run a worked example using your TK–5 FTE count, so you can see exactly how much stays with your coaches under each option.
Course 1 · Learn · CDE-approved
Six modules that give every TK–5 teacher the same foundation in how children learn to read, written for California classrooms, and checked through real instructional scenarios rather than quizzes.
6
modules, about an hour each
≤15 hrs
online, self-paced
6
Instructional Scenario Reviews
TK–5
with multilingual learners at the center
Module by module
Each module ends with an Instructional Scenario Review built from the California ELA/ELD Framework vignettes: a real classroom situation, a decision to make, and feedback on why the strong choice is strong.
01
What decades of research say about how children learn to read, and what it looks like in a TK–5 classroom with multilingual learners in the room.
Instructional scenario review
A first-grade teacher plans a small-group lesson for three students at different decoding stages. Which decisions reflect the evidence, and why?
02
Hearing, isolating and manipulating sounds, and why this comes before letters for many children.
Instructional scenario review
A kindergarten vignette: the teacher runs a phoneme-blending warm-up and two students stall. Choose the next move.
03
Teaching the code explicitly and in sequence, and building from it rather than around it.
Instructional scenario review
A second-grade reader decodes CVC words but stalls on vowel teams. Analyze the sample and select the next instructional focus.
04
Accuracy, rate and expression as the bridge from decoding to understanding.
Instructional scenario review
Third-grade fluency data shows accuracy is fine but rate is low for a third of the class. Decide how to group and what to run.
05
Building knowledge and language so that decoding turns into meaning.
Instructional scenario review
A fourth-grade teacher introduces a science text to a class with eight newcomers. Identify which moves give every student access.
06
Making sure the strategies reach the students with the largest gaps: students in special education, multilingual learners and children still learning the code.
Instructional scenario review
Pull the threads together: review a classroom profile and name the focal students, the strategies and the first lesson you would teach.
Modules run about an hour and can be done in a PLC block or PD day. No evening homework assumed.
Principals, coaches and TOSAs take the same course, so feedback and planning use the same vocabulary.
Completion is tracked for every cohort and site, and leads straight into Course 2 with your focal students already chosen.
Next step
Teachers carry their focal students and anchor strategies straight into Launch into Structured Literacy.
Course 2 · Apply · CDE-approved
The application course. Each teacher names three to five focal students, applies the strategies from Course 1 in four targeted lessons with them, and brings the student work back to coaches and peers. The classroom practice is the course, and it is credited as professional learning time.
3–5
focal students per teacher
4
targeted lessons, 1 to 2 times a week
6–8 wks
typical span, inside the literacy block
Credited
classroom time counts toward hours
Step by step
Six short steps run across six to eight weeks. The online pieces are brief; the substance is the four lessons taught with your own students and the evidence you bring back.
01
Using screener and classroom data, each teacher names three to five students, with priority for those with the largest gaps.
What you bring
A short focal-student profile, reviewed by your coach or PLC.
02
From the Course 1 toolkit, pick the two or three strategies that match what your focal students need.
What you bring
Your anchor strategies and a lesson calendar for the next four weeks.
03
Teach the strategy with your focal students in a real lesson, 1 to 2 times a week, and capture what happened.
What you bring
Lesson plan, reflection and student work for Lesson 1.
04
Use what the student work told you. Adjust the strategy, the grouping or the pace, and teach again.
What you bring
Two more lessons with reflections and work samples, and one piece of coach or peer feedback.
05
Bring the strategy to the whole group where it fits, while keeping the focal students at the center.
What you bring
Final lesson and reflection, plus an updated note on each focal student.
06
Present the focal-student story to your PLC, coach or principal: where they started, what you taught, what changed.
What you bring
Your focal-student story. That is the assessment.
LearnSync gives your coach an operating system for the cycle: what to look for, when to meet and what evidence to review. County lead staff accounts are free.
Teachers in the same grade band run the cycle together and review each other's student work in collaboration time.
A guided reflection path walks a teacher through each step with prompts and examples when no coach is available.
Next step
Both courses are included for the full school year, with the resource library, lesson materials and completion data for every cohort and site.